Taste Is Not Decoration
A great deal of work comes overdressed and eager to be admired.
The symptoms rarely vary. The surface polished to a mirror. The grade pushed an inch past belief. The type enters with a little curtsy. The transition performs. The second idea is laid delicately over the first, as if the first might be too fragile to survive alone.
Effort, everywhere, applied like lacquer.
We are encouraged to call this beautiful. Occasionally, with a straight face, someone calls it premium. If the lighting is expensive enough, they may even call it cinematic. What we almost never call it, correctly, is decoration.
Because taste and decoration are not the same instinct. They are very nearly opposite ones.
More than a century ago, a Viennese architect named Adolf Loos gave a lecture with a title rude enough to survive history: Ornament and Crime. A short, bracing read, should one wish to ruin a great deal of expensive work forever.
His claim, roughly, was that a culture reveals its maturity by what it can bear to remove. The flourish, the filigree, the applied pattern: to Loos these were not sophistication but its absence, a nervousness dressed up as richness.
Naturally, he did not leave the argument safely on paper.
He built it.
On a grand square in Vienna, facing the imperial palace, he raised a facade with almost nothing to flatter the crowd. No moldings above the windows. No decorative gestures. No little architectural apology offered to soften the blow.
The city recoiled. They called it the house without eyebrows.
The emperor, it is said, kept the curtains drawn on that side of the palace rather than look at it.
What Loos understood, and what the scandal proved, is that removing decoration is far more frightening than adding it.
Decoration is taste after it has lost its nerve: safe, hospitable and desperate to give the eye a place to rest, the client a place to point and the room something to praise. Nobody was ever considered dangerous for adding one more flourish.
Taste is the opposite transaction. It is subtraction performed in public.
Taste is the confidence to leave the space exposed, to trust the single gesture, to take away the reassurance and let the thing stand there plainly, almost indecently, meaning exactly what it means.
That is why true taste can feel so indecent.
It does not over-explain itself. It does not decorate the wound. It does not add lace to the verdict.
We know something about that transaction here. There was a season, not long ago, when the sensible move would have been to show more. More work. More credits. More proof. More gleaming evidence stacked so high the eye could no longer feel the difference between what was merely visible and what was worth seeing.
So we removed it.
We let the crown go dark. Not because there was nothing to show. Because there was too much noise around the showing. That was not an absence of taste. That was the whole of it.
Decoration asks to be understood quickly. Taste can survive an awkward silence. Decoration fills the pause. Taste lets it sharpen.
Decoration is what you add when you are not certain the work is enough. Taste is the judgment that knows exactly what the work is, and has the nerve to stop before the spell is spoiled.
At Eleanor, this is how we choose.
Not for the reel with the most on it. Not for the frame that has mistaken abundance for conviction. Not for the director who arrives with references stacked like defense evidence.
We look for the instinct that knows what to leave off.
The filmmaker who understands that restraint is not emptiness. It is pressure with breeding. The one who knows a held look can do what a hundred cuts cannot. That an untouched space can accuse. That the most persuasive frame is often the one brave enough to stand there without ornament and still make the room lean closer.
The unusual suspects were never the loudest names.
They were the ones who knew what to remove. The ones who could resist the extra flourish. The ones who could leave the silence intact. The ones who understood that beauty, when overhandled, becomes obedience.
Anyone can add. Anyone can decorate. Anyone can mistake more for meaning.
The rarer thing, darling, is a house with the taste to take something away, and the nerve to know exactly what should remain.
Lady Eleanor xx
Meet the directors who know what to leave out
Don’t miss the next story.
A weekly dispatch from Eleanor on filmmaking, creativity and the business behind the work.